HOMEBREW Digest #5989 Thu 03 January 2013
FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org
***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:
No "sponsor-level" donation yet this year
Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********
DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:
HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton, MI 48187-6309
or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************
Contents:
"Klone Beers" (Stephen Neilsen)
What is a recipe? ("David Houseman")
copper (steve hodge)
A thanks, and a plea (Joseph M Labeck Jr)
Send in the clones... (Patrick Babcock)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.
Financial Projection as of 03 December 2012
*** Condition: Cautiously Optimistic ***
501(c)3 status rescinded. Refiled 1023 for retroactive
status 25 June 2012. Did not hear back within 90 days;
therefor, must assume that there are issues and our case
must be assigned to an agent. IRS is currently assigning
applications received in February 2012. Ours was received
in June. We will not have our status reinstated for the
2012 tax year. To current financials, HBD is officially
bankrupt in May. Due to recent political developments,
HBD.org will likely have to be dissolved per the bylaws
once funding runs out.
Projected 2012 Budget $3191.79
Expended against projection $3137.96
Unplanned expenditures $ 331.88
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1282.62
As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you.
Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org
If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!
To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.
HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.
LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.
The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.
More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.
JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 21:34:12 +1100
From: Stephen Neilsen <stephen.neilsen at gmail.com>
Subject: "Klone Beers"
David Houseman hops on and sadly off his soapbox.
I am firmly of the belief that the concept of cloning is at best flawed
and in reality an insult to the beer you wish to imitate. One of the great
joys of brewing is, having tasted a beer you like, conceptualising it in
your head...how did they do that, what hops, which specialty malts, what
base malt even, yeast, mash regime, fermentation profile,. You will never
produce a clone but you can and with proper research will produce a beer
that exemplifies the characters that you found so drinkable in the original.
It takes work, but follow David's advice about research and you will
surprise yourself at what you can do...follow a so-called recipe and all
you are doing is following.
Stephen
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:15:28 -0500
From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: What is a recipe?
So what is a recipe and what do you expect from a recipe. When I see
published recipes, typically the malt bill, hops and yeast are all that are
specified. Look at the recipe from
(http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f12/indian-brown-ale-dogfish-head-48622/):
10oz British amber malt
10oz Crystal 60L
8oz Chocolate malt
2oz roasted barley
Steep all of this at 150F for 30 minutes
Add 7lb Light DME
8oz Dark Brown sugar
1/2oz Warrior Hops for 60 Minutes
1oz Vanguard Hops at Flameout
Ringwood Ale Yeast/Wyeast 1187
This is totally inadequate to reproduce this beer. What other factors
affect the outcome of the beer that is not specified? What parameters does
Dogfish Head control in their brewery to reproduce the same beer each time?
- What is the alpha acid content of the hops?
- How is the malt crushed?
- What is the pH of the mash? The boil?
- What is the target OG? FG? IBU? SRM?
- Light DME? Each DME is very different. What brand since how the DME is
made has a dramatic impact on the final product.
- How much wort is collected from the steeping?
- What is the size/shape of the fermenter?
- Is the wort aerated and to what oxygen concentration?
- What is the cell count that is pitched?
- How long is primary fermentation? At what temperature?
- Is this beer fined? Filtered? Carbonated to how many volumes?
ETC.
You get the point. Even this recipe, published by Sam, will not likely
create a clone of their Indian Brown Ale. Not because Sam is necessarily
protecting his intellectual property, but because many of these factors are
not relevant to home brewers. And by clone I mean a beer that tastes the
same as the original. It will likely produce a good beer, but the final
product depends on a LOT of unstated parameters that depend on your brewery.
So if any two of us make this beer, the two beers will be quite different.
I bring this up so that home brewers will think about their brewing, not
just blindly follow some "recipe." Take what you sense when drinking a
beer and the fundamentals of brewing and have that inspire your own recipe
that includes all these parameters. Take careful notes so that you can
repeat the process should you like to repeat the beer or tweak the recipe.
Can't find Warrior as a bittering hop? Does it matter if you substitute
Cluster that you have on hand?
Good luck brewing but learn how each ingredient affects the final product
and how to formulate recipes that work on your brewery.
Dave Houseman
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:32:51 -0500
From: steve hodge <steev.hodge at gmail.com>
Subject: copper
A buddy of mine got a copper wort chiller for Christmas and expressed
some concern about the amount of copper it may add to the wort,
especially with respect to the US EPA action level of 1.3 mg per L
(http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm).
Could anyone point me to studies that have been done, or has anyone
made these measurements themselves? A cursory search turned up "trace
amounts", "it's actually beneficial to the yeast", etc., but no
numbers.
I suggested it's a good time to have his water tested (for mashing
purposes) and that a pre and post cooled sample of wort may provide an
answer.
Thanks,
Steve
Steve Hodge
Salem MA
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 11:24:56 -0500
From: Joseph M Labeck Jr <jmlabeck at joesjokearchive.ws>
Subject: A thanks, and a plea
First and foremost, thanks for the replies to my question about my
winter ale. I learned a lot (as I always do here). and I know what to
try when I next make this.
Now, now one prompted me to write this. I have read the HBD for a very
long time, since back when my hair was still brown. Now, I'm completely
gray, and retired. I was able to squeeze a little out of my bank account
to help out.
Back when I was still a new brewer, trying to figure all this stuff out,
the Digest was there for me. It's only right that, as much as possible,
I be there for the HBD now.
Besides my small donation, I'll try to drum up some support on my
podcast (http://bligtalkradio.com/youmakewhat). I don't have a huge
audience, but maybe it'll help. If we all do a little, it will get done.
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 07:35:46 -0500
From: Patrick Babcock <patrick.babcock at gmail.com>
Subject: Send in the clones...
Greetings, Beerlings! Take me to your brewing log...
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Stephen Neilsen
<stephen.neilsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> [...] cloning is [...] in reality an insult to the beer you wish to imitate
Au contraire, mon ami! Imitation is the highest form of flattery!
> [...]...follow a so-called recipe and all you are doing is following.
Here we part company as well. Though we are in violent agreement that
the process is infinitely variable, and, in terms of pure process
control, has too many degrees of freedom, one of the things we as
"socialized" home brewers (should) strive for is the ability to
reproduce our results - hence our intense focus on data and the
recipe. In attempting to reproduce the results someone else achieved
with a different system, different lot of ingredients, at a different
time of the year, etc., the recipe and their system/process data is
your only starting point. Yes, you can divine your own recipe as we
typically do when going after the profile of a commercial example, but
when going after the nectar produced by your brewing buddy, assuming
s/he doesn't treat it as a state secret, their recipe including
information regarding their system and process is the starting point -
but, even without understanding their system, just the recipe alone
gives you the jumping off point. And in (effective) process control
regimens, demonstrating mastery of the basics - the recipe - is the
gateway to "process tampering" and improvement toward the original. In
other words, once you can produce consistent results to the recipe,
you have demonstrated enough control over your process to be able to
make meaningful changes.
To summarize: don't throw the baby out with the bath water. There is
much to be learned simply by following a recipe and "getting it right"
in terms or replicating it before adjusting technique or ingredients
to approach your ideal. (In fairness, I don't think Stephen meant this
post to come of quite as it did. His - and Dave's - points regarding
research and experimentation are spot on and well taken, but you can't
discount the recipe as the foundation of the effort, nor the practice,
as idealistic as it seems, of cloning a commercial (or other) beer is
a great motivator. I can name at least one brewer who rose from the
ashes to great brewing prowess through his singular focus on
replicating his (at that time) favorite beer. You know him, too: AHA
Governing Board Member Chris "Crispy" Frey. Perhaps he will chime in
with some of his insights to this discussion...
-
--
Pat Babcock
HBD, Inc.
------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5989, 01/03/13
*************************************
-------
