Thursday, June 23, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5850 (June 23, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5850 Thu 23 June 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Re: Yeast propagation (Fred L Johnson)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:07:42 -0400
From: Fred L Johnson <FLJohnson52 at nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Yeast propagation

BobZ (Robert Zukosky) has been propagating his yeast using low gravity wort
with aeration with the idea of avoiding the Crabtree effect and hence produce
more yeast with less wort. This method of yeast propagation intrigued me
greatly a number of years ago, and I tried my hand at it quite a bit. I
certainly was able to produce a significant mass of yeast, but I had lots of
problems with foaming in the starter. Some of the yeast from these
propagations looked pretty bizarre--pronounced fusiform shapes--and, more
importantly, I thought some of the beers made from these starters were not
very good, so I abandoned the method. My experience is NOT what has been
reported. Over 15 years ago, researchers were reporting that they could
produce excellent beer with yeast propagated aerobically in low glucose
media. I think I could do a better job with this method today than I did
years ago, and I may give it another try.

I'm not certain that Bob's 4P wort is at a low enough concentration to avoid
the Crabtree effect. The threshold for the Crabtree effect appears to be
about 0.4% glucose and a typical wort can contain 1.5% glucose (so I've
read), in which case a 4P wort would contain about 0.6% glucose, shifting the
yeast into fermentation mode. I would like to see the cell counts of Bob's
propagations to know if he is getting cell counts that are significantly
better than the standard step-up propagation method using the same amount of
sugar in lower volume. The aerobic (non-fermentative) method must provide
sugar at low concentrations by continuously infusing concentrated wort/sugar
into a volume that dilutes the sugar to a level below the threshold level of
the Crabtree effect. As cell numbers increase in the vessel, the rate of
medium infusion is increased proportionally.

I also was never able to find information on how quickly the disaccharides
in wort (like maltose) would be split into monosaccharides to further
increase the glucose level in the medium. (If someone has some figures on
this, I'd love to see them.) To use the method properly, one needs to monitor
glucose levels in the culture--something I never did. I suppose one could use
a medium containing only glucose as the sugar to avoid the potential problem
of having glucose levels rise from conversion of maltose and other
dissacharides, but I wonder if this would generate a yeast that would not use
the maltose in the wort into which it is ultimately pitched.

All of the propagation is to be conducted in an aerobic environment, which
Robert is doing. The air Robert is providing certainly helps produce some
healthy yeast, but I'm not certain that he is getting any more yeast than he
would if he added the same amount of sugar substrate using a higher gravity
wort (in a smaller volume).

Bob: If you could provide the cell counts from some of your propagations,
that would be informative to the discussion. If you would like to send me
small samples from a well-suspended culture, I could send you the cell
concentrations.

Fred L Johnson

Apex, North Carolina, USA

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5850, 06/23/11
*************************************
-------