Monday, July 25, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5861 (July 25, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5861 Mon 25 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
2011 E.T. Barnette Homebrew Competition Results (Scott and =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ch=E9rie_Stihler?= )


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 18 July 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of retroactive reinstatement.
See Site News on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1949.15
Unplanned expenditures $ 38.95
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1933.83

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:24:43 -0800
From: Scott and =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ch=E9rie_Stihler?= <stihlerunits at mosquitobytes.com>
Subject: 2011 E.T. Barnette Homebrew Competition Results

Please join me in congratulating Steve Jayich of Anchorage, Alaska
for winning this year's E.T. Barnette Homebrew Competition!

He won the competition with a very nice Robust Porter.

As always the competition was fierce! In many case a third of a point
or less separated the winners.

We received 49 entries from 8 states. Entries were received from as
far away as Alabama and Mississippi.

For complete results please go to:
http://www.mosquitobytes.com/Den/Beer/Events/ETB2011/ETB2011.html.

Cheers,

Scott Stihler
[2874, 324.9] Apparent Rennerian Statue Miles

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5861, 07/25/11
*************************************
-------

Friday, July 15, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5860 (July 15, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5860 Fri 15 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Rinsing PBW ("Michael D. Noah")


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of retroactive reinstatement.
See Site News on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1949.15
Unplanned expenditures $ 38.95
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1919.28

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:24:32 +0900
From: "Michael D. Noah" <michael.noah at physaliaos.com>
Subject: Rinsing PBW

I was speaking with the folks from PBW at the National Homebrewer's
Conference last month in San Diego, and I asked them that exact same
question.

The answer given was that they recommend using the same temperature for both
wash and rinse only because they didn't want their users to break any glass
by subjecting it to very hot and then very cold water. There was NO other
suggestion offered, other than to keep the wash temperature below 140
degrees F, or the PBW will begin to degrade and lose its effectiveness.

Hope that helped.

Michael


------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5860, 07/15/11
*************************************
-------

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5859 (July 14, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5859 Thu 14 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Rinsing PBW (Jeff Hewit)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of retroactive reinstatement.
See Site News on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1949.15
Unplanned expenditures $ 38.95
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1919.28

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:29:28 -0400
From: Jeff Hewit <bippoj at gmail.com>
Subject: Rinsing PBW

The directions for Powder Brewery Wash indicate that the rinse water
should be the same temperature as the wash water. How important is
this? I am doing cleaning outside and heating the wash water in the
boil kettle. It would certainly be a lot easier if I just use the water
as it comes out of the hose for rinsing. I know some of you chemist
have a better idea that I as to how this stuff works, and could shed
some light on this.

Thanks.

Brew On!


------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5859, 07/14/11
*************************************
-------

Thursday, July 7, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5858 (July 07, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5858 Thu 07 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
How to use a HERMS system (Kevin Eggemeyer)
Re: How to use a HERMS system ("David Houseman")
Re: How to use a HERMS system (Mike Schwartz)
RE: How to use a HERMS system ("Mike Patient")
Ginger beer/kefir grain questions (David Huber)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 02:37:10 -0500
From: Kevin Eggemeyer <keggbrewer at gmail.com>
Subject: How to use a HERMS system

I'm for saving the enzymes! But it's not always easy. Beta-amylase's
optimum temperature is between 144F to 149F. It is heat sensitive and
rapidly denatured at even slightly higher temperatures----very rapidly
inactivated at 158F. Heating the circulating wort in a HERMs above this
temperature will change the enzyme profile of your mash. So, this
potentially doesn't leave much room for a temperature difference to drive
the heat transfer.

The question is: Will the change in the mash enzyme profile affect the
character of the beer to a noticeable extent? The answer, in part, depends
on what the attenuation level of the beer is supposed to be. Higher
attenuation beers would need more care regarding the maximum temperature to
which the wort/mash is exposed. Of course, enzyme activity is not stable
over time either and also falls off, so you have to get their quickly AND
without a large "Delta T" creating enzyme destroying hot spots.

Kevin


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:12:33 -0400
From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: How to use a HERMS system

Bruce,

I have a HERMS system from More Beer. Instructions, my practice and
experience has the HLT about 10 to 15 degrees hotter than the temperature
you are trying to achieve in the mash tun. Enzyme deactivation is not just
exposure to temperature but also the time at the temperature. If you are
pumping wort through a HERMS coil, it isn't spending much time at the higher
temperature and it's a small percentage of the wort at any time. When the
HLT is the same temperature you are trying to achieve, the mash tun takes a
very long time to reach that temperature because you are approaching the
temperature asymptotically, averaging the lower temperature of the mash tun
with the heated wort at the target temperature. Going higher means that you
will hit the target temperature much quicker. I have not had a problem
deactivating enzymes with my HLT set at say 165 move my mash tun from 132 to
150 and then maintain the 150 for an hour. I then set my HLT to about 180
to 185 and by the time it is at that temperature the HLT is ready to move
the mash tun up to a 168-170 mash out temperature.

Dave Houseman


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 07:39:33 -0500
From: Mike Schwartz <mjs at seadogboats.com>
Subject: Re: How to use a HERMS system

Bruce Fabijonas asked "How to use a HERMS system"

I used one for many years. It used 20 feet of 3/8" ID copper tube in a coil
in the HLT. I would set my HLT at about 170F to do the rise to
saccharification temperature and 185F to do the mash off, so about 20F
degrees above my target mash temperature. This allowed the temperature to
rise roughly 1 to 1.5F/ minute, though it slowed some as it approached the
target temperature. Never had any issues with destroying enzymes prematurely.
I suspect that the brief time that the wort spent in the tube

at the elevated temperature was not enough to destroy the enzymes to a
degree that would affect the conversion. I used this system on a wide range
of beers including a weizen that was 70% wheat malt where I did steps at 110F
(combination acid, ferulic acid, beta glucan), and 153F.

Mike Schwartz

Beer Barons of Milwaukee

beerbarons.org

worldofbeerfestival.com

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 12:26:52 -0400
From: "Mike Patient" <mpatient at rta.biz>
Subject: RE: How to use a HERMS system


It is my understanding that you want to set the HLT to the target temp.
HERMS is a slow ramp, that is what you are getting.
If you feel the wort is cooling too much in transit, set it a degree or two
higher, but if you set the HLT to 155, you are mashing at 155.
How slow are you talking about?
I feel some people exaggerate when they say how fast their mash rises.
The following website is very useful
http://sdcollins.home.mindspring.com/HERMS.html

Mike


------------------------------

Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:22:22 -0400
From: David Huber <n3uks.dave at gmail.com>
Subject: Ginger beer/kefir grain questions

I recently listened to an interview with Raj Apte from the 31 August
2006 Basic Brewing Radio podcast
(http://media.libsyn.com/media/basicbrewing/bbr08-31-06.mp3) regarding
using the ginger-beer plant to make beverages, and I checked out his
presentation given at the 2006 NHC
(http://www2.parc.com/emdl/members/apte/GingerBeer.pdf). I recently
started making my own kefir and I love ginger beer, so I wanted to
give this a shot. Unfortunately, the source he cites back then,
Fermented Treasures, doesn't seem to be in business any longer. I
think I found another source to get the plant, but doing some more
digging around I am confused between ginger beer plant and what seems
to be called water and/or sugar kefir. Are they the same? I can find
a fair number of people on-line who are selling "water kefir," but
hardly anyone who is selling the ginger beer plant. My guess is that
we're talking about the differences between, say, WLP001 and WLP002,
but I want to make sure I get something that makes decent ginger beer
and other soft drinks.

On this same topic, has anyone tried throwing these grains into a
beer? I'm wondering whether the lactobacillus and the yeasts can
thrive in a secondary, or whether they would just die out from the
alcohol and the low pH.

Dave Huber
Jessup, Md.

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5858, 07/07/11
*************************************
-------

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5857 (July 06, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5857 Wed 06 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Re: Poorly fermentable wort (Adam Arndt)
How to use a HERMS system (Bruce Fabijonas)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 11:24:42 +0000
From: Adam Arndt <adama at microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: Poorly fermentable wort

Fred,

I have to throw my $0.02 behind Joe's wager on a low diastatic power mash
and hot spots that make a bad situation worse.

Although I find it very difficult to obtain Deg Lintner ratings for Weyerman
malts, most source that have access to this information seem to indicate a
"typical" Deg Lintner rating of 76 for this malt. (And Weyermann has two
distinct Pilsner products which makes this a bit more difficult without
knowing which one you were using.) As Joe also pointed out there can be
lot-to-lot or year-to-year variations so I think a worst-case of 70 is
feasible.

In any event both of the unmalted wheats are providing 0 diastatic power to
the mash.

The WM Pilsner malt accounted for 50% of the total grist so the mash
diastatic power was 35.5 assuming a 76 deg Lintner malt and as low as 30 for
the entire mash if the pilsner malt had an actual DP of 70 deg Lintner.

That's cutting it very close to the 30-35 Deg Lintner minimum for mashing.
I would have expected an hour and 50 minutes to still have been enough to
complete conversion. (As the results of your starch test seemed to
indicate.) I recently brewed a historical porter with a total mash DP of 30.1
and it was still failing the starch test at 90 minutes.

If the mash and the resulting beer now truly pass a proper starch test
there's not too many options left that it could be so I also have to make my
wager on hot spots.

Adam

________________________________

About Microsoft Ireland: www.microsoft.com/ireland

Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited. A company incorporated and registered
in Ireland number 256796.

Microsoft Ireland Research. A company incorporated and registered in Ireland
number 342235.

Registered office 70 Sir John Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2, Ireland

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:52:48 -0400
From: Bruce Fabijonas <mathbruce at gmail.com>
Subject: How to use a HERMS system

Not as bio-chem heavy as other questions, but here it goes.

Not too long ago, I built myself a HERMS system. The idea was to do step
mashes and to zero in on mash temp when I undershoot my target temp. My
question is about the set temperature in the hot liquor tank for a given
step.

Suppose I want to raise the mash from 122F to 151F. Should the hot liquor
tank be set at the target temp (151F), or something higher? To date, I have
always set my HLT to the target temperature, believing that I don't want to
destroy the enzymes in the wort. I have measured the temperature of the wort
after going through the HLT and found that the wort has risen to the
temperature of the HLT. The problem is that the temperature in the mash tun
changes very slowly. Painfully slowly. In fact, I have seen the temperature
dip before rising. I assume that the coefficients of heat conductivity for
the liquid and the grain are vastly different. One suggestion recently
proposed to me was to raise the temperature of the HLT to something much
higher, even boiling, so that the mash temperature rises more quickly. But, I
argued, think about the enzymes! The response I got was along the lines of
relax, don't worry.... What about almost boiling wort hitting my grain
bed--can we say tanin extraction? Again, the response was relax...

So, what's the consensus? Am I alone in this quest to save the enzymes?

Thank you.

Bruce

Sent from my iPad

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5857, 07/06/11
*************************************
-------

Tuesday, July 5, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5856 (July 05, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5856 Tue 05 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Re: Poorly fermentable wort (Fred L Johnson)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 05:42:23 -0400
From: Fred L Johnson <FLJohnson52 at nc.rr.com>
Subject: Re: Poorly fermentable wort

Many thanks to all of you for the responses to my question on why my Belgian
wit wort was so unfermentable. Suggestions have included that the
saccharification temperature was too high due to uncalibrated thermometers,
dead space below a false bottom in the mash tun, uneven mash temperatures
through the mash, low beta amylase in the pilsner malt, and high gravity due
to dissolved proteins.

Regarding the mash tun, there is no false bottom and the mash was stirred
well during frequent, gentle heating. My thermometer is calibrated and
traceable to an NIST standard, so I trust the mash temperature values. The
mash had a negative iodine test for over thirty minutes before transferring
it to a lauter tun.

I suppose it is possible that there was insufficient beta amylase in the
grist, but that would not be characteristic of this malt. The published
Hartong Index for this malt is a range of 34-43%. Perhaps someone could
further comment on the possibility of low beta amylase activity, considering
50% of the grist was unmalted wheat. I suppose I could treat the beer with
amylase--assuming the enzyme will work under post-fermentation
conditions--and see just how much more fermentable this beer could be. I did
read from one professional brewer (Garrett Oliver of Brooklyn Brewing) that
he uses a "two-stage rest" with a "long" 152 degrees F saccharification rest,
but I don't know what "long" means to him and I don't know what the other,
undescribed rest is. Perhaps I need to really lengthen the mash time.

The possibility of a high starting gravity due to soluble proteins seems to
me to be the most likely explanation for what I observed. One private email
suggested "...your protein rest is the culprit". I suspect this was referring
to my not actually having a proper protein rest. David Houseman also
recommended a more extensive mash profile including an acid rest, a protein
rest, a beta-glucan rest, and a saccharification rest. In this regard, I did
need to acidify the grist to get the pH down to 5.3 (at mash temp). But I had
no problems lautering this grist, for which a beta-glucan rest would be
indicated.

I suppose I could perform the old Lowry protein assay on the beer and
compare it to a beer that was more fermentable, but I'm not sure the Lowry
assay will react with short peptides that could be contributing to the
gravity. I know wheat beers contain more dissolved protein than an all-barley
malt beer, but I'm not sure how to easily determine how much of the gravity
is due to the protein or peptides without making up standard solutions of
beer proteins--too much trouble.

If the high final (and original) gravity is simply due to high protein
levels, do these types of beers need to have a more extensive protein rest?
I don't see that high protein levels are actually causing a problem with the
beer. It seems that a high protein level merely needs to be accounted for
when formulating the recipe, determining an adjusted target starting gravity
to achieve the desired alcohol content of the beer.

Perhaps the simplest thing to do would to be to rebrew this with David
Houseman's suggested multiple rests just to see how much different the beer
could be with the extensive step-mash profile.

Any other suggestions?

Fred L Johnson

Apex, North Carolina, USA

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5856, 07/05/11
*************************************
-------

Monday, July 4, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5855 (July 04, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5855 Mon 04 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Poor Attenuation ("John W. Zeller")
Re: Poorly fermentable wort ("David Houseman")
Re: Poorly fermentable wort (Joe Walts)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 02:27:48 -0400
From: "John W. Zeller" <jwzell at cincic.com>
Subject: Poor Attenuation

Fred L Johnson inquired about why his beer is not finishing out
sufficiently. Well Fred, this is a very common problem for many home
brewers. You are far from alone. Here's my read on the situation.
IMO, your mash temperatures were too high. I know that you think you
had a good handle on the mash temperatures, but what I am trying to say
is that the temps may have been much different than what you think they
were. This could be a problem with the thermometer(s) or possibly with
your technique. Direct firing a mash tun while manually stirring the
grain bed is a very hit or miss way to go. It certainly can be done,
but it's very difficult to maintain uniform mash temperatures and there
is a high risk of overheating the wort. I don't know how your mash tun
is set up, but if you are using a false bottom, remember that you cannot
stir the wort below the FB and that is where the heat is being applied.
You can circulate the wort manually, a la vorlaugh to keep the wort from
pooling on the very hot kettle bottom. My solution to the temperature
control was to move up to a semi-autmatic direct fired RIMS. Others
will chime in and tell you that you probably under-pitched or did not
properly aerate the wort, but the No. 1 suspect IMO is the mash
temperature. I would look there first and foremost.

-john zeller
cincinnati

------------------------------

Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2011 07:37:36 -0400
From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Poorly fermentable wort

Fred,

Was the 1.021 FG due to fermentable sugars or proteins? With 50% wheat, my
step mash schedule would have been more like 95oF for 15min acid rest,
120-122oF for 20min protein rest, 130-132oF for a beta-glucan rest and then
150oF saccraffication rest until conversion indicated with iodine test, then
mashout (for solubility). Perhaps the wort was adequately fermentable but
the gravity is due to proteins.

David Houseman


------------------------------

Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2011 09:00:12 -0500
From: Joe Walts <jwalts at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Poorly fermentable wort

I'd wager that your pilsner malt had insufficient beta amylase. I
don't know if German pilsner malts usually have less beta amylase than
the Belgian pilsner malts usually used in witbiers, but it could be a
seasonal variation of the particular malt that you used. My next
guess would be that heating your mash created hot spots that denatured
some of the beta amylase, which may have already been in short supply
due to the high proportion of adjuncts. I don't think the raw wheat
was an issue because your efficiency was good, suggesting that both
starches and alpha amylase were abundant. Did you test for large
starches in the wort?

Joe

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5855, 07/04/11
*************************************
-------

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Homebrew Digest #5854 (July 03, 2011)

HOMEBREW Digest #5854 Sun 03 July 2011


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

Logic, Inc. - Makers of Straight A Cleanser
www.ecologiccleansers.com

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Poorly fermentable wort (Fred L Johnson)


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection As of 12 May 2011
*** Condition: Green & Healthy ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of reinstating. See Site News
on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2011 Budget $3671.04
Expended against projection $1489.37
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1858.82

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:06:07 -0400
From: Fred L Johnson <fljohnson52 at nc.rr.com>
Subject: Poorly fermentable wort

I just had the following experience with a poorly fermentable wort. I would
greatly appreciate any insight from anyone who could explain why this wort
was so poorly fermentable.

I brewed a Belgian witbier (6 gal) with 50% Weyermann pilsner malt (5 lb),
30% raw wheat (3 lb), 20% torrified wheat (20 lb). I would have used 50%
wheat or 50% torrified wheat, but I had 3 lb of raw wheat lying around that I
wanted to get rid of. I boiled the raw wheat and the torrified wheat on the
stove top in several quarts of water for about 30 min. I then used a food
processor on the wheat to fully expose the wheat starch to the rest of the
grist. I mixed the blended wheat into the ground pilsner malt and mashed in
with a protein rest (127 degrees F, not the target 122 degrees F) for 10 min.
I raised the temperature of the mash to 152 degrees F by direct heat
(stainless steel mash tun) on a burner, stirring constantly. Because my mash
tun is only insulated on the top with a styrofoam lid and no side insulation,
I give the mash a little heat about every 20 min to maintain the mash temp at
152 degrees F. The total mash time was 1 hr and 50 min. I transfered the mash
to a lauter tun with no mashout and sparged into the boil kettle, collecting
a total volume of 6.6 gal. Mash efficiency was 85.4%. O.G.= 1.050.

The boil was 90 min, adding hops to 17 IBUs and ground coriander just before
flame out. I pitched Wyeast 3944 from a two liter starter, ~ 350 billion
cells after oxygenating the wort with pure oxygen. Fermented at 69 degrees F
for 7 days when the fermentation stopped, but the yeast were not flocculating
very well. I raised the temp to 72 degrees F for the last 24 h. The yeast
were still not flocculating. I crash cooled to 35 degrees F and a good bit of
the yeast fell out, but many were obviously in suspension and still dropping.
I transferred to a keg and discovered the gravity was 1.021!

I force fermented a 200 mL sample of this beer with an 11 g packet of
Notingham dry yeast at 76-78 degrees F to prove to myself that the
fermentation was not stuck. The gravity only 1.020-1.021 after the forced
fermentation, so I am convinced that the problem was not the yeast.

Can anyone explain to me how I generated such a poorly fermentable wort?

Fred L Johnson

Apex, North Carolina, USA

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5854, 07/03/11
*************************************
-------