Sunday, March 25, 2012

Homebrew Digest #5923 (March 25, 2012)

HOMEBREW Digest #5923 Sun 25 March 2012


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

No "sponsor-level" donation yet this year

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
Re: Homebrew Taste ("David Houseman")
Lager Question (TARogue)
Re: Oxidation Help ("\\-s@roadrunner.com")


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.

Financial Projection as of 03 March 2012
*** Condition: Guarded ***
501(c)3 revoked in process of retroactive reinstatement.
See Site News on http://hbd.org for details and progress.
Projected 2012 Budget $3191.79
Expended against projection $ 721.78
Unplanned expenditures $ 79.98
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) ($ 725.01)

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you


Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 08:40:00 -0400
From: "David Houseman" <david.houseman at verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Homebrew Taste

Mike,

I agree that oxidation, from old stale liquid malt extract and hot-side
aeration is one of the problems with some homebrew. However in my
experience this doesn't result in the "wet cardboard" form of oxidation
which is more typically from oxygen introduced post fermentation. Rather
the result I sense is a dullness with muted, caramel-like notes. Oxidation
can take a number of sensory forms, and each person may describe their
perception differently so we may agree that oxidation isn't good and we
don't like the results.

David Houseman


------------------------------

Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 10:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: TARogue <tarogue at yahoo.com>
Subject: Lager Question

I made an attempt at a lager last week. The krausen never got very big, but
it did go up and then settle back down. It sat in my basement at
48/48/50/52/54/56/54 degrees. High krausen occored on the first 54 degree
day, Today I racked it into secondary and moved it to a lagering fridge. The
initial gravity was 1.048. Today it was at 1.026.

The recipe was 22 lbs of US 2-row and 3 oz of Saaz hops. I mashed for about
45 min at 148. Mashed out with 190 degree liquor for 10 minutes and boiled
for 60. I used Fermentis dry lager yeast S-23.

The final gravity should be about 1.012. My question is: will it continue to
drop points when cooled to 36-38 degrees? Or should I take t back out and
move it somewhere warmer for a couple days?

And this is why I do so much better with ales.

- --

-Tom

http://www.facebook.com/Out.Haus

------------------------------

Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 18:29:56 -0400
From: "\\-s at roadrunner.com" <"\\-s"@roadrunner.com>
Subject: Re: Oxidation Help

James R. Gregory asks for help regarding oxidation...

> I am a relatively new all grain home brewer and am trying to get rid of a
> slight "homebrew" taste in some of my brews. I suspect it may be oxidation
> related. To date I have bottle condition all brews.
>
>
>
> I am looking for advice on preventing oxidation. I try to keep splashing,
> etc. to a minimum when transferring from carboy to bottling bucket. So I am
> looking for other tips and any comments on the following:
>
>
>
> 1. Should I flush carboys, bottling bucket and bottles with co2. I
> read the recent "flushing" discussion and am still confused. Stupid
> question, but, if this is a good idea what is best way to get co2 equipment
> and rough cost.

You don't need to flush your primary fermenter as you want the yeast to
have access to O2. If you move the beer to a secondary fermenter you
should always do so while there is active fermentation under way - and
again there is no need to flush so long as the container is reasonable
full (95% full not 50%) and don't splash. If you are bottle
conditioning then I wouldn't use O2 scavenging caps, and you can just
fill normally and leave a cap sitting on top of the bottle to rest for a
minute before sealing. The CO2 from the beer will push out most of the
O2, and the remainder can be used by the yeast.

> 2. Are the more expensive bottling caps that absorb oxygen worth the
> money.
If you are bottling w/o bottle conditioning and you intend to store the
beer for much time or at suboptimal temps - then yes.


> 3. I have heard that adding a very small amount of sodium or potassium
> bisulfite to brew prevents oxidation. Anything to this and, if so, how is
> it done.
Yes - it's very effective. I suggest you start with campden tablets
(commonly used for wine making
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Campden_tablets), or alternatively you can
get potassium metabisulfite powder which may be slightly better. I'd
add a minimum of 2 campden tables (~1gm) crushed to a 5 gallon mash.
You can certainly triple that amount. With "too much" you'll eventually
get a sulfury edge to the beer - not unlike a white wine - tho it
'works' well with some lagers.

Generally this makes the beer taste much fresher and a little crisper.
The sulfite acts as an anti-oxidant and even can convert come already
oxidized flavor actors to unoxidized states. The end products are
sulfate (which you may be adding as gypsum) and a little sodium or
potassium.

> 4. Any other suggestions.

In my experience it's rare to get bottle oxidation in a bottle
conditioned beer. I've done side-by-sides and the bottle conditioned
beers really do taste better much longer (it's just such a PITA to
bottle). So IF your problem is really oxidation - it's either happening
in the mash or else your ingredients are oxidized. Metabite in the mash
will cure any mash oxidation problem and maybe even help any ingredient
issues a little. My main ingredient concern would be to use good hops.
Hops oxidation is a real potential problem.

Another possibility is that you are getting yeast autolysis in the
bottle. Some yeast disintegrate after bottle conditioning and leave a
meaty-brothy flavor and even leaves some oily rancid flavors (a hint of
dead mouse). Most of the hi-alcohol ale yeasts do very well in the
bottle. Also you should end up with a little opaque layer of yeast in
the bottom of bottle - not a quarter inch.

-S

------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5923, 03/25/12
*************************************
-------