Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Homebrew Digest #5995 (January 15, 2013)

HOMEBREW Digest #5995 Tue 15 January 2013


FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY:

No "sponsor-level" donation yet this year

Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
A fun idea (Joseph M Labeck Jr)
Wort experiment ("Steve Johnson")


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to
meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500
per year. If less than half of those currently directly
subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would
be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to
spare for next year. Please consider it.






Financial Projection as of 03 December 2012
*** Condition: Cautiously Optimistic ***
501(c)3 status rescinded. Refiled 1023 for retroactive
status 25 June 2012. Did not hear back within 90 days;
therefor, must assume that there are issues and our case
must be assigned to an agent. IRS is currently assigning
applications received in February 2012. Ours was received
in June. We will not have our status reinstated for the
2012 tax year. To current financials, HBD is officially
bankrupt in May. Due to recent political developments,
HBD.org will likely have to be dissolved per the bylaws
once funding runs out.
Projected 2012 Budget $3191.79
Expended against projection $3137.96
Unplanned expenditures $ 331.88
Projected Excess/(Shortfall) $1282.62

As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged
and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you.

Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org

If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!!

To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word
"subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL
ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!**
IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to
the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address
for the automation - that's your job.

HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at
http://hbd.org.

LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go
instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there.

The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright
HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK
before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content
cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit.

More information is available by sending the word "info" to
req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org.

JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning,
Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce


----------------------------------------------------------------------


Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 09:49:43 -0500
From: Joseph M Labeck Jr <jmlabeck at joesjokearchive.ws>
Subject: A fun idea

OK, I admit this is not world-changing importance. But, it's so much
fun, I just had to share it.

For the last few years, my niece has held a family party for St
Patrick's Day, and has made Irish stew with stout as an ingredient in
the gravy. Last year, she asked me if I would brew a stout, just for
that event. I was honored, and did so.

It was yummy, and it started me thinking. My son and nephew both brew. I
thought, why not have a little family competition? Everyone agreed, and
we decided to call it The St Patrick's Day Stout Smackdown. And my
daughter-in-law decided to join in, so we now have 4 stouts competing
for the right to be included in dinner. A friend of ours, Will Siss, who
writes a column for the local paper called The Beer Snob, and who also
blogs about beer (http://drinkreadlive.blogspot.com/), has agreed to be
guest judge for our little competition.

It promises to be a good night, and good fun, with good beer.

Oh, yeah. I have a blog, too. (http://youmakewhat.blogspot.com)

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:12:21 -0600
From: "Steve Johnson" <sjohnson3 at comcast.net>
Subject: Wort experiment

William in Michigan asks about the malt experiment they are planning to do.
I applaud your thinking and planning and think it has the potential to be a
very
informative activity for your club. I've done a few similar things with our
club
in Nashville over the years, including some yeast comparisons by splitting
one
really large batch and fermenting in small 3 or 5 gal. carboys to come up
with
5 different batches to ferment with 5 different yeasts.

One thing to consider is how you plan to try to control for some of the
other
variables besides the grain bills in these mashes. If each of your brewers
is
going to brew on their own system, there may be some uncontrolled issues
related to mashtun configuration and run-off , mash temp, system efficiency,
sparge temps, etc. that could have a pronounced effect on the final product
that ends up being fermented. Fermentation temperature control could have
an impact as well, even if as you say you are planning to work on
controlling
the yeast count with similar pitching rates by yeast volume. Fermentation
vessel shape and size could impact the final product as well.

I would think that an ideal scenario would be to make all of the batches on
the
same system and then ferment all of the finished worts in the same temp.
controlled space. This is probably not very practical, but perhaps some
back-to-
back brew sessions with whomever has the best systems could cut down on some
of the variability in the process factors.

Finally, how the finished products are carbonated, whether kegged or
bottled,
will also impact the final result. Kegging them all at the same time with
the same
process of force carbonating might be one way of controlling that.

I'm not saying that you guys won't learn from the experience. Regardless of
how
you manage these other variables (or not), I am sure that you will still be
able
to taste some major differences in each of these finished beers. Sounds like
a
great club experience! Make it a BJCP training opportunity for some future
judges!

Steve Johnson
Music City Brewers
Nashville, TN

Good lu


------------------------------
End of HOMEBREW Digest #5995, 01/15/13
*************************************
-------